maineman » 02 Jun 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑
I can't understand why you would ask the first one. I have never said or implied that evidence of child abuse is boring or funny. Clearly, the one with reading comprehension issues is YOU. Now run along. I am done with you.
I asked the first one because in response to OP's post you put the following
' For the love of God, give that crumpled horse corpse a rest!
'
Evidence of this molestation exits in what has been confirmed as being her diary. How is my question unreasonable?
No, I'm not raking through history to 'provide links'. If you can't directly dispute a point, then question your own links.